Hello Friends,

I want to know which is the best available packer, can any one here suggest me one or two of them, please tell me the packer which is good in all anti virus lookup..

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

aspack or upx

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

your choice depends from your needs.
if you only want to compress executable - upx is the best.

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

my need is not only to compress the executable but to protect the source-code and to protect the executable from being modified..

I know it seems almost impossible if we speak in reverse engineering terms.. but ain't there any way from which i can really protect my file from being decompiled.

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

starforce is the best ! i niipet

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

Packers are very big evil!!!
bbs.vbstreets.ru/viewtopic.php?t=28535

-----
The truth is out of there...

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

protect.sys - your brain...;)
and upx for compress
---
???? ?? ???????...????? ?????? ?????????? ?????, ???? ????????? ?????? "??????" ??????...

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

at first, packer!=protector
aim of packer is to compress executable with best compress ratio, but in case of protectors, file size usually increases well.

but ain't there any way from which i can really protect my file from being decompiled.
execute your code on VM (virtual machine) - most new protectors support this feature.
your code will be less readable until custom VM-decompiler will be created for your app.
keep in mind that when your x86/x64 code will be converted to VM code, it will be executed much slower!

-----
EnJoy!

| Сообщение посчитали полезным:

Lumen:
Packers are very big evil!!!
bbs.vbstreets.ru/viewtopic.php?t=28535
To me it is absolutely indifferent how many my packed program takes memory in a "pagefile", but the size of the packed "exe"-file is important only.

| Сообщение посчитали полезным: